On 8/7/2018 1:13 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/7/2018 12:08 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>>> I don't see what making an alias to a namespace has to do with it.
>> That was your suggested workaround, was it not?
> No, it was not. It was about making an alias to the members of the namespace.

BTW, the mass confusion and misunderstandings in this thread is why Manu should write a DIP.

On Tuesday, 7 August 2018 at 02:25:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> Let's see if we can find some common ground.
>
> The boilerplate I suggested seems to enable DPP to generate working code that behaves "as if" the namespace scope is not there, even for nested namespaces.
>
> Is this correct?

Yes, I've already implemented it.

I'm not sure what the impact will be with nested namespaces in real headers. I guess we'll have to see.

On 8/7/2018 3:49 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
> Yes, I've already implemented it.

Wonderful!


> I'm not sure what the impact will be with nested namespaces in real headers. I guess we'll have to see.

Yes.