Tim Locke wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:46:26 -0400, "Ben Hinkle"
> <ben.hinkle@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>int main()
>>>{
>>>   A[char[]] x;
>>>   x["a"] = *(new A); // Create an instance of the struct.
>>>   x["a"].a = 1;
>>>   return( 0 );
>>>}
>>
>>Note the *(new A) will allocate a new A and then copy the contents to x["a"] and then throw away the allocated memory. So a way of doing the same thing without allocating extra memory is to
>>x["a"] = A.init; 
> 
> 
> What is the concise method of initializing the members of my array of
> structs? It seems long-handed to do this:
> 
> x["a"].a = 1;
> x["a"].b = 2;
> etc.
> 
> Can this be shortened? According to spec_DMD_0.109.pdf, pages 100-101,
> I *think* I should be able to do something like this:
> 
> x["a"] = {a:1, b:2};
> 
> But the compiler gives me the following error: "expression expected,
> not '{'". I also tried replacing {} with () and got "found ':' when
> expecting ')'".
> 
> Thank you.
> --
> On the Internet, no one knows you're [using] a VIC-20.

The {a:1, b:2} format is the struct static initializer syntax, used with static and const declerations only, sadly.  Hopefully in the future it becomes more general purpose (related issues to array literals).  While it isn't perfect, you can do this, which at least reduces the number of array lookups to one:

# with (x["a"]) { a = 1; b= 2; }

In fact, I guess you could technically even do:

# with (x["a"]) a = 1, b = 2;
# with (x["b"] = A.init) a = 1, b = 2;

So long as with() doesn't require braces after it.  (I think it does, mostly because nobody ever thought of a case where you wouldn't need them... suppose I just did.)

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls

On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:41:43 -0500, Chris Nicholson-Sauls <ibisbasenji@gmail.com> wrote:

>Tim Locke wrote:
>> What is the concise method of initializing the members of my array of structs? It seems long-handed to do this:
>> 
>> x["a"].a = 1;
>> x["a"].b = 2;
>> etc.
>> 
>> Can this be shortened? According to spec_DMD_0.109.pdf, pages 100-101, I *think* I should be able to do something like this:
>> 
>> x["a"] = {a:1, b:2};
>> 
>> But the compiler gives me the following error: "expression expected,
>> not '{'". I also tried replacing {} with () and got "found ':' when
>> expecting ')'".
>
>The {a:1, b:2} format is the struct static initializer syntax, used with static and const declerations only, sadly.  Hopefully in the future it becomes more general purpose (related issues to array literals).  While it isn't perfect, you can do this, which at least reduces the number of array lookups to one:
>
># with (x["a"]) { a = 1; b= 2; }
>
>In fact, I guess you could technically even do:
>
># with (x["a"]) a = 1, b = 2;
># with (x["b"] = A.init) a = 1, b = 2;
>
>So long as with() doesn't require braces after it.  (I think it does, mostly because nobody ever thought of a case where you wouldn't need them... suppose I just did.)

Thanks for the help. I didn't expect so many options.
--
On the Internet, no one knows you're [using] a VIC-20.