July 01, 2021 Re: D vs C++ classes? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Ola Fosheim Grøstad | On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 11:26:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: >On Wednesday, 30 June 2021 at 14:13:23 UTC, Alexandru Ermicioi wrote: you are right. | |||
July 01, 2021 Re: D vs C++ classes? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to zjh | On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 12:18:38 UTC, zjh wrote: >On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 11:26:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad >Recently, I find V language, and its many feature are copying from
| |||
July 01, 2021 Re: D vs C++ classes? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to zjh | On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 12:18:38 UTC, zjh wrote: >On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 11:26:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: >On Wednesday, 30 June 2021 at 14:13:23 UTC, Alexandru Ermicioi wrote: D D is a general purpose programming language not just systems programming language. >C++ is our good friend. This should not be only from C++, but all languages. >
I'm not against better C++ interop, and would like to have it. I'm against adjusting core features of D just to make it compatible with C++ without using extern (C++) modifier, in other words not opt in. >Recently, I find V language, and its many feature are copying from Well, I'm also for better C++ interop, just not for the sake of sacrificing flexibility of a language to evolve. | |||
Permalink
Reply
