Thread overview
Pointers to structures
Mar 19, 2021
DLearner
Mar 19, 2021
Imperatorn
Mar 19, 2021
Cym13
Mar 19, 2021
novice3
Mar 19, 2021
ryuukk_
March 19, 2021
Could it be made acceptable, at least for -betterC option, to use '->' as an alternative to '.'?

'ptrStructVar->MemOfStructVar' is a very common idiom in C.

Best regards




March 19, 2021
On Friday, 19 March 2021 at 11:23:36 UTC, DLearner wrote:
>
> Could it be made acceptable, at least for -betterC option, to use '->' as an alternative to '.'?
>
> 'ptrStructVar->MemOfStructVar' is a very common idiom in C.
>
> Best regards

You could try search and replace '->' with '.' see how it goes
March 19, 2021
On Friday, 19 March 2021 at 11:23:36 UTC, DLearner wrote:
>
> Could it be made acceptable, at least for -betterC option, to use '->' as an alternative to '.'?
>
> 'ptrStructVar->MemOfStructVar' is a very common idiom in C.
>
> Best regards

In D '.' can be used to access the member of a struct regardless of whether you are manipulating the struct itself or a pointer to that struct. So you can just write 'ptrStructVar.MemOfStructVar' and it will work without any issue.
March 19, 2021
On Friday, 19 March 2021 at 12:19:47 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
> In D '.' can be used to access the member of a struct regardless of whether you are manipulating the struct itself or a pointer to that struct. So you can just write 'ptrStructVar.MemOfStructVar' and it will work without any issue.

i guess, idea was to reduce manual work then adapt C sources to D.
i have similar wishes for "typedef ...".
it is boring to rewrite it then making C binding.
March 19, 2021
On Friday, 19 March 2021 at 13:15:16 UTC, novice3 wrote:
> On Friday, 19 March 2021 at 12:19:47 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
>> In D '.' can be used to access the member of a struct regardless of whether you are manipulating the struct itself or a pointer to that struct. So you can just write 'ptrStructVar.MemOfStructVar' and it will work without any issue.
>
> i guess, idea was to reduce manual work then adapt C sources to D.
> i have similar wishes for "typedef ...".
> it is boring to rewrite it then making C binding.

Nobody needs to manually write bindings nowadays

https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep

I use it to generate the bindings of the C headers libs i need

Works most of the time, sometimes i have to do some cleanup, but it's faster than doing all the thing manually

Alternatively one can use dpp https://github.com/atilaneves/dpp