DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.

After six months without a response from the DIP author, I decided to move this DIP out f Post-Final and into Formal Assessment rather than marking it as Abandoned. It's a simple DIP and it was the last stage of the process, so it seemed a waste not to go forward.

Walter and Andrei were willing to accept the DIP with some revisions (details in the review summary at the bottom of the DIP). I reached out to Jonathan Davis and he agreed to make the revisions. He got the revised document to me just before DConf, so by the time I was ready to hand it back to Walter and Andrei after DConf, Atila was in the mix. None had any objections and here we are.

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md

On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.
>
> After six months without a response from the DIP author, I decided to move this DIP out f Post-Final and into Formal Assessment rather than marking it as Abandoned. It's a simple DIP and it was the last stage of the process, so it seemed a waste not to go forward.
>
> Walter and Andrei were willing to accept the DIP with some revisions (details in the review summary at the bottom of the DIP). I reached out to Jonathan Davis and he agreed to make the revisions. He got the revised document to me just before DConf, so by the time I was ready to hand it back to Walter and Andrei after DConf, Atila was in the mix. None had any objections and here we are.
>
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md

And after just posting about how I had forgotten to push a commit on another DIP, I forgot to push my final commit to this one. It now has a proper summary of the Formal Assessment.

On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.
> ...
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md

So what is the "version" in @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ supposed to be? That still seems to be ambiguous.

On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 2:47:23 AM MDT Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars- d-announce wrote:
> On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> > DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.
> > ...
> > https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md
>
> So what is the "version" in @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ supposed to be? That still seems to be ambiguous.

How is it ambiguous? It says right in the same sentence that @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ is mentioned.

- Jonathan M Davis

On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 at 11:40:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 2:47:23 AM MDT Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars- d-announce wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> > DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.
>> > ...
>> > https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md
>>
>> So what is the "version" in @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ supposed to be? That still seems to be ambiguous.
>
> How is it ambiguous? It says right in the same sentence that @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ is mentioned.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

Wow. Note to self, don't read post and sleep all at the same time.