On Monday, 7 November 2022 at 09:35:25 UTC, zjh wrote:
>On Monday, 7 November 2022 at 09:12:51 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
>I'm also in favor of "fixing" betterC because of similar reasons
There are several betterC
container libraries. If they are integrated into the standard library
, it would be cool. With the powerful template function, they are not much worser than C++
.
If the 'C++'
is well interfaced, it is really cool.
Because C++
has several inherent defects. betterC
can be more comfortable.
C++'s shortcomings is that you have to use ugly macros
anyway.
while 'rust'
has ugly syntax, unnecessary wordy lifetime, dependency hell, and slow compilation speed.I don't Why do these people like it
?
Mostly because it is an ML inspired language with C++ like capabilities, a cool type system, but above all, it doesn't matter how it looks, because a bunch of big corporations decided it was going to be their C++ replacement, and it already powers part of Android, AWS and Azure.
Just like I am not a big Go fan, yet due to CNCF products, it landed on my plate as well.