Thread overview
dlang.org Re-Design Dark Theme
Mar 14, 2016
Jakob Ovrum
Mar 14, 2016
Nordlöw
Mar 14, 2016
Jakob Ovrum
Mar 14, 2016
Russel Winder
Mar 14, 2016
jmh530
Mar 14, 2016
Russel Winder
Mar 14, 2016
jmh530
Mar 14, 2016
Jakob Ovrum
March 14, 2016
Hello,

Here's a light-on-dark theme userstyle for the recent dlang.org re-design:

https://gist.github.com/JakobOvrum/e00f97f30bba4b24b6bc

The front page looks like this:

https://i.imgur.com/zuwVu7r.png

The theme supports the front page, articles, language specification, Phobos documentation and the forums. Other subdomains, like code.dlang.org, issues.dlang.org and wiki.dlang.org are unaffected.

The userstyle document is compatible with Stylish/Firefox. I might put it on the Stylish repository in the future for easier install.

Suggestions, forks, uploads to Stylish and so forth are all welcome. The important part is that we have an alternative that is nice on the eyes for us who use dark-coloured UIs.
March 14, 2016
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 12:00:24 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> Suggestions, forks, uploads to Stylish and so forth are all welcome. The important part is that we have an alternative that is nice on the eyes for us who use dark-coloured UIs.

Looks great, apart from the red-flags on the bottom-right of the screen being a bit too dark.
March 14, 2016
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 13:25:02 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
> On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 12:00:24 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
>> Suggestions, forks, uploads to Stylish and so forth are all welcome. The important part is that we have an alternative that is nice on the eyes for us who use dark-coloured UIs.
>
> Looks great, apart from the red-flags on the bottom-right of the screen being a bit too dark.

Thanks. Those are actually Gravatar images blocked by the Request Policy extension.

March 14, 2016
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 12:00 +0000, Jakob Ovrum via Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Here's a light-on-dark theme userstyle for the recent dlang.org re-design:

Is this intended as a Stylist style option for the site?

Light writing on dark background is so much nicer that the reverse.

-- 
Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder



March 14, 2016
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 16:42:27 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> Light writing on dark background is so much nicer that the reverse.

I disagree.
March 14, 2016
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 16:42:27 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> Is this intended as a Stylist style option for the site?

Yeah, I just don't want to bother with authenticating on their site right now. Feel free to submit it if you'd like to see it there. I don't know how maintenance/updating of userstyles on the Stylish repository works but how bad could it be? :)

> Light writing on dark background is so much nicer that the reverse.

I personally agree, but I don't really care which is the default as long as both are available.

The issue with light-on-dark is that if it's not applied consistently then the occasional "flashes of light" will be really disruptive, bordering on painful, and apparently for some people it's even a medical issue. I really like how Stylish handles this conveniently in a non-intrusive manner. People who don't care don't even have to know about it.

March 14, 2016
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:14 +0000, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 16:42:27 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> > 
> > Light writing on dark background is so much nicer that the reverse.
> I disagree.

Your choice, which is why the site should have both, so as not to piss off the people who disagree.

-- 
Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder



March 14, 2016
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 17:39:43 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> Your choice, which is why the site should have both, so as not to piss off the people who disagree.

Fair enough.