Anyone know what the official status of llvm 3.4 is? The website continues to list 3.3 as the current release while now indicating that 3.5 is the upcoming release; there's nothing on the announcements mailing list archive, but the development release of Ubuntu has landed 3.4 packages with release version numbers, not rc.

Really I'm just wondering which llvm-dev I should use for my next LDC build :-P

On Monday, 30 December 2013 at 08:42:37 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> Anyone know what the official status of llvm 3.4 is? The website continues to list 3.3 as the current release while now indicating that 3.5 is the upcoming release; there's nothing on the announcements mailing list archive, but the development release of Ubuntu has landed 3.4 packages with release version numbers, not rc.
>
> Really I'm just wondering which llvm-dev I should use for my next LDC build :-P

I just used the llvm trunk together with LDC a week a ago and it worked fine.

I've no idea why they removed 3.4 on the llvm site. Maybe it's just not fully updated yet.

Hi Josepd!

On Monday, 30 December 2013 at 10:05:18 UTC, Dwhatever wrote:
> On Monday, 30 December 2013 at 08:42:37 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>
> I just used the llvm trunk together with LDC a week a ago and it worked fine.

Currently, it is broke (changed or new library). I'll fix this soon.

> I've no idea why they removed 3.4 on the llvm site. Maybe it's just not fully updated yet.

I think that's it. There was no announcement on the devel mailing list.

Regards,
Kai

On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 15:40:07 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> On Monday, 30 December 2013 at 10:05:18 UTC, Dwhatever wrote:
>> I've no idea why they removed 3.4 on the llvm site. Maybe it's just not fully updated yet.
>
> I think that's it. There was no announcement on the devel mailing list.

I'm assuming that more than anything it's just holiday-induced crossed wires :-)

On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 15:40:07 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> Currently, it is broke (changed or new library). I'll fix this soon.

Ok, this was a problem of my build environment. You can use LLVM 3.4 or LLVM trunk without problems.
There is a known failure with LLVM trunk - it is possible an instance of issue #546 (https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/546).

Regards,
Kai

On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 20:21:35 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 15:40:07 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
>> On Monday, 30 December 2013 at 10:05:18 UTC, Dwhatever wrote:
>>> I've no idea why they removed 3.4 on the llvm site. Maybe it's just not fully updated yet.
>>
>> I think that's it. There was no announcement on the devel mailing list.
>
> I'm assuming that more than anything it's just holiday-induced crossed wires :-)

The LLVM page now lists 3.4 as latest release.

Regards,
Kai

On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 15:58:14 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> The LLVM page now lists 3.4 as latest release.

Ta. :-)