July 20, 2013
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 00:47:53 UTC, Manu wrote:
> This raises the parallel question of:
>   alias A(T) = expression;
>
> Which I think is equally common as the enum case described here?
>

Common or not, I'd expect consistency.
July 21, 2013
On Tuesday, 25 June 2013 at 21:31:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP42

Reading through this thread, I already foresee a messy specification coming along for this. Instead, I'd propose something different that would keep the rules consistent yet have many more applications:

template(...) declaration = ... ;

So what you would have instead:

template(T) enum E = ... ;
template(T) alias A = ... ;

There's also the possibility for simple template constraints as well:

template(T) if(...) enum E = ... ;

Anything more complicated, such as static if, is probably best left to the classic style:

template E(T)
{
	static if(...) enum E = ... ;
	else enum E = ... ;
}
July 22, 2013
On 06/26/2013 12:15 AM, bearophile wrote:
> But it's not immediate to assign a generic lambda:
>
> alias sum = (x, y) => x + y;
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9426

1 2 3
Next ›   Last »