On 13 Aug 2015, at 7:35, Martin Nowak via dmd-internals wrote:
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 02:58:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Let's do that then.
Yep, 2.067 sounds good and it seems one of gdc/ldc will have a 2.067 before 2.069.
Most definitely. LDC already passes the test suite on x86_64 and we are currently just cleaning up the fallout of the many half-done fixes/improvements in 2.067. We could actually even release a beta right now if it helps you, but it would have a pretty big codegen speed regression.
I'd propose that we require ddmd to be compilable with the latest 2 versions of dmd/ddmd, e.g. 2.067.x and 2.068.x and with the latest available versions of gdc and ldc.
It seems to me that just one version would be enough?
— David