Ok.  It's on the list and hopefully have time to work on it in a couple of weeks.


On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> wrote:
On Monday, June 03, 2013 02:38:33 Daniel Murphy wrote:
> IIRC this is the "import blah;" vs "import blah : *" that we discussed at
> the conference.

It's not. It works just fine when importing something like std.datetime.all
which publicly imports the package, but with your changes, the public imports
in package.d don't allow std.datetime.DosFileTime to work, unlike with
std.datetime.all. To quote my comment in the pull request:

-----------------
I don't think that this is a problem with the proposal that this is trying to
implement. I think that the problem is in the implementation. Note that using
a public selective import didn't work either, and both aliasing and selective
importing std.datetime.common.DosFileTime in std.datetime.package should have
worked, even if simply publicly importing std.datetime.common didn't. Also, if
I create three modules like so:

a.d

int i = 7;
b.d

public import a;
c.d

import std.stdio;
import b;

void main()
{
    writeln(b.i);
}
the code compiles and prints 7. Module c is able to use b.i as if i were in b
when in fact it's in a. So, the public importing itself does what we want for
this proposal.

I don't think that there's necessarily anything wrong with the proposal that
this pull request is trying to implement. It would work if you were trying to
import std.datetime.all. and then use std.datetime.all.DosFileTime. I think
that the problem has to be in how the implementation translates
std.datetime.package into std.datetime. Clearly, specifying the full import
path doesn't work with it even though it works with public imports normally.
-----------------

> I can't remember what our resolution for that is, so I'll
> have another go when I do.  And when I'm done with DAC.  And I finish
> exams.  And I finish the DMD -> D port. etc  Haven't given up, just no time.

Well, life happens. I'm plenty busy as well. I just figured that I'd ask, since
you never responded to my comment in the pull request, and I wasn't sure
whether you'd read it or not.

- Jonathan M Davis
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos