Ha! There's a perfect example of what I
mean...
To those who are reading this in "plain text" I
apologize for the markup codes, but it looks like they are "necessary" at this
point.
Well, I'll try this again, in HTML and see if they
go through... ∴∈⊆⊂⊃∧∨∏∑∫√∝∞∠≈≠≤≡≥
Not sure what went through, but I see what came
back on this end. All of the characters I was talking about have been
converted to question marks!
Oh, and in case they do... "≡" is the one I was
talking about as an alternative for the "is" operator. Would be nice to
allow it... but there is a question of whether or not it would get used, and a
question of whether or not it may be lost when the source core is saved or sent
or in some other way transfered from it's original location.
TZ
> It's too bad most keyboards
don't have keys for symbols like ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?,
?, ?, and ?. It's interesting that Japanese can be typed in Hiragana,
Katakana, or Romanji characters, and yet we can't find a way to include such
useful characters as these in a programming language. No insult to anyone
intended here, by the way. No one person is responsable for this
situation. It just is.
>
> Wouldn't it be nice though, if "?"
could be used as an alternative to the "is" operator for identity, at the very
least? But... I for one can say that I've tried to type such things in
Notepad and it simply wouldn't let me, no matter how I went about it... and
Notepad is still what I am typing most of my D source code in.
>
>
TZ
>
>
>