08-Feb-2013 19:34, Brian Schott пишет:

On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:23:00 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:

On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:12:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:

DMD is still consistently faster, :(

We might be getting to the part where we say that code generated by
gcc is still consistently faster than code generated by ldc.

For the lulz I compiled with "dmd -release -inline -noboundscheck -O
-m64 -property":

http://hackerpilot.github.com/experimental/std_lexer/images/times3-dmd.png

Yes, dmd vs ldc actually is a matter of 32 vs 18 ms for datetime.

Would be intereesting to try gdc as dmd on linux uses gcc.