On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> wrote:

They were shoved out the door without being fully sorted out first instead of
being done on a separate branch first and sorted out there prior to being
released.

Yeah. OK, water under the bridge.

I thought that we had decided that they'd be in 2.061 but
undocumented for the moment so that people could use them

I'm afraid I see a slight contradiction in the previous statement :)

but that they wouldn't be put in the docs until they had been fully sorted out so that they
could be properly treated as experimental.

Er...

I propose this:

- update the changelog to say UDA are implemented, but are potentially subject to change. Use them, people, and report!

- merge Jacob's pull request to have a documentation. Proeminently put a warning in the docs saying this is an experimental feature (I know, this should be a parallel branch, that's not the case, give it a rest).

- collect impression in 1-2 months.

I mean, how can the devs hope for any return on UDA if they are an Easter egg feature?