"Manu" <turkeyman@gmail.com> wrote in message news:mailman.128.1394856947.23258.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com...

> Haven't we already agreed a pragma for force inline should be > implemented. Or is
> that something I have dreamed?

It's been discussed. I never agreed to it (I _really_ don't like it), but I'll take it if it's the best
I'm gonna get.

I don't like stateful attributes like that. I think it's error prone, especially when it's silent.
'private:' for instance will complain if you write a new function in an area influenced by the
private state and try and call it from elsewhere; ie, you know you made the mistake.
If you write a new function in an area influenced by the forceinline state which wasn't intended
to be inlined, you won't know. I think that's dangerous.

Huh?  The pragma could easily be restricted to apply to exactly one function declaration, if that's what's desired.