On 6 April 2012 13:23, Walter Bright <newshound2@digitalmars.com> wrote:
On 4/6/2012 2:54 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
Should add additional information to the type Foo. I don't see any issues with
it, and not supporting it would be very strange.
@attr(foo) int x;
int y;
work? Are x and y the same type or not?
Yes they are the same type.
Now, consider:
auto c = b ? x : y;
c was not attributed, and has no attributes.
@blah auto c = b ? x : y; // NOW 'c' is attributed with 'blah', as useless as that is :)
Attributes are on the declaration, and not passed around.