On 22 February 2013 18:59, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakeling@webdrake.net> wrote:

On 02/19/2013 09:34 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:

I posted this to our bugzilla, I'm not sure if I'll have the time to
look at this one.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37

Just to note -- with your pull request #50 now included in GDC, things speed up very slightly.  Removing the const from the Julia value code, results become comparable to g++ and the C++ implementation (i.e. about 4.3 s for the 'double' case).

LDC still produces a faster executable for this particular code, but then, clang++ also produces a faster executable than g++.