On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakeling@webdrake.net> wrote:

On Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 01:33:51 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:

that's not DRY: in my use case, a group of functions use certain imports,
it would be annoying and not DRY to do that. What I suggest (allowing {}
grouping at module scope) seems simple and intuitive; any reason it can't be done?

How do you ensure that the imports are limited to your {} scope, but your functions are not, without a finnicky special case for how scopes work?

granted, that's not ideal. How about the other points I mentioned?

void fun(){

version=A;

version(none):

}