On 6 February 2014 02:16, Dicebot <public@dicebot.lv> wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 February 2014 at 16:13:33 UTC, Manu wrote:
Huh? Why would they? They don't create cycles, and would clean up reliably.

Because they still return T* and not RC!T ? Andrei's post speaks purely about extra library type and does not mention about possibility to make it default allocation type for language.

Or it is just silently assumed?

Dunno, but I don't think any solution which uses RC!T will ever be acceptable. It basically defeats the whole purpose.