On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr@gmx.ch> wrote:
On 01/02/2012 09:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"maarten van damme"<maartenvd1994@gmail.com>  wrote in message
news:mailman.1985.1325157846.24802.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com...
I think it would be an object oriented language, I'm a believer in the
string theory :)

I heard on the Science Channel that M-theory was becoming favored over
string therory. (Not that I would actually know.)

I have actually thought of the whole universe as one big simulation, would
really explain how light waves without medium (like a math function).


I came across a book one time that talked about the 'verse basically being
one big quantum computer. I didn't actually red through it though, and I
can't remember what it was called... :(

If I were god I would def use object oriented because it makes for easy
describing of different particles and strings. and I'm pretty sure there
is
no garbage collector included in gods language :p


If I were god, then I'd presumably be omnipotent, and if I were omnipotent,
then I'd be able to do it all in something like FuckFuck, or that
shakesperian language, or that lolcat language without any difficulty. And I
could just fix any limitations in the implementation. So that would seem the
best option :)



God cannot be omnipotent. If he was, he could invent a task he cannot solve.

He has; the human race.