On 14/07/2018 1:04 PM, Manu wrote:
> Determining that requires at least a cursory exploration.
Given how many of us are objecting to the syntax, I'm going to place
this requirement upon a 'yes' answer by me. That an attempt is made for
an alternative syntax discussion. It's a fair request I think.
I just want to reiterate again, I'm not seeking alternative syntax, I just want to know that proposed syntax can work broadly, or if there are any challenges or problems that would restrict it from broad application.