On Tuesday, 23 March 2021 at 00:35:31 UTC, Manu wrote:
> I'm really late to the party here, and there's a lot to catch
> up, so maybe I'm repeating discussion that already happened...
> but I think there's a few points that need consideration.
>

The extern(C++) case has not been discussed much so far. It goes
without saying that it needs to be as close as C++ as it can be.
I assumed the DIP to not apply to extern(C++).