On 3 Jul 2014 01:50, "Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d" <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/2/2014 2:28 PM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>> On 2 July 2014 19:58, via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't really understand the reasoning here. Is D Intel x86 specific?
>>
>> Yes it is, more than you might realise.  I've been spending the last 4
>>
>> years breaking it to be platform agnostic. :o)
>
>
> I think you're conflating dmd with D.
>

I suppose I am just a bit. At the time I was thinking about the spec on _argptr (which has been fixed), __simd and intrinsics.