On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 7:30 AM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On 6/9/2020 4:30 AM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
> That is no reason for another [instance of the same] compiler not to have access
> to symbol table,

Since the linker has this information already, there's no reason to not do the
job in the linker.

Redundant work, undesired object bloat, and various potential link issues/errors.