(In reply to thomas.bockman from comment #8) > > Well, I can make it a candidate for 2.067 > > That would be appreciated. > > Don't bother if it looks like it will be too much work though; I only filed > this because I figured that just adding it to the grammar would be quick and > easy since it doesn't need to actually *do* anything. > > Either way, you're going to support pragma(inline, ...) for real in 2.068, > right? Yes, though there is a matter of getting cross-module inlining to work first before I can say that "proper" support should be added.