On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:15 PM aberba via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 July 2020 at 01:26:55 UTC, Manu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:00 PM JN via Digitalmars-d-announce <
> digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, 4 July 2020 at 13:00:16 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
>> wrote:
>> > See
>> > https://rainers.github.io/visuald/visuald/VersionHistory.html for the complete list of changes.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Rainer
>>
>> Anyone who uses VisualD and Code-D can compare the two? (Yes,
>> I know the difference between Visual Studio and Visual Studio
>> Code).
>>
>
> The difference is night vs day... VisualD is, by far, like
> REALLY FAR, the
> most mature and useful IDE and debug environment for D.

That's depends on what you're comfortable with and if you're a
core windows guy... how you use it too.

Not really. VisualD is objectively the most functional and competent IDE/Debugger solution, BY FAR.
It's not an opinion, it's a measurable fact.

Obviously, if you are into vim/emacs/whatever, then you don't actually really care much about IDE support and debugging, and in that case, this question is not relevant to you.
I agree that Code-D + VSCode is probably the second best solution, but there's really no comparison; the debugger is a kind of funny/sad joke, the D debug experience is poorly integrated, and the intellisense/autocomplete is nowhere near the same standard. There's no competition.

Code-D is great work, but it's still catching up, and it may never do so because VSCode just has an embarrassingly bad debugger :(