On 31 May 2013 01:48, Entry <no@no.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 14:49:12 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 14:13:47 UTC, Entry wrote:
Take a minute to think about why we're all communicating in English here. Let's see if you can figure it out.

Well that's condescending :/ and fallacious.

To answer your question, it may have something to do with the fact that these are the English forums? Just a wild hunch. Oh. And because we *can* speak English? That could also have something to do with it.

There are tons of non-English speaking programming forums out there. Maybe those that don't speak English are over there? Heck, there are a few non-English threads in learn.

Oh. And did you know TDPL was published in Japanese? Why bother right?

I just think that it's better to focus on two very specific languages with two very specific purposes (D for programming and English for communication). 'Twas just an idea, I don't care if you write your code in hieroglyphs.

I really really agree with you.

Yet, I think they are orthogonal concepts, and that the D programming language has no business choosing which communication vector its users should use.

It's not just a matter (imo) of "I wouldn't force it upon anyone", but "I think everyone should choose what's best for them".

Yeah. I know. Same conclusion, but there is a nuance.

I'm glad you agree, though I believe that I never said anything about D 'choosing' which human languages are compatible with it. I just expressed my belief that should people choose to construct something, be it a ship or a computer program, the usage of a single language will greatly enhance their progress (ever heard the story of the Tower of Babel? wink wink). Sorry if my previous comment seemed hostile, that was not my intention.

This is the definition of a *convention*, not a rule.