On 2 October 2012 18:56, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/2/12, Manu <turkeyman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, this leaves a problem...Well actually you can't use the first syntax at all with templates or
> Distinction between:
> Event x; // using defaults
> and
> Event!() x; // explicitly selecting none (which would fall back to the
> defaults)
>
> Is such a distinction possible? I presume not...
>
templated types. :/