On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/30/13, Philippe Sigaud <philippe.sigaud@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does that syntax come with DMD 2.064? The (T) part, I mean.

Yes.

Ah, that's cool! I've been waiting for that one for years.

Glad to see you here btw, do you have your own solution to the problem?

As Benjamin, I used an internal stack. But that was years ago, let me see.

or, for graphs:

Hmm, what I did there doesn't seem really lazy. I guess with today Phobos and DMD it's possible to have far less allocations.

(that code dates from 2009-2011)