On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:25 PM Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 October 2020 at 06:06:41 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 10:54:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
>> Review of DIP 1037, "Add Unary Operator ...".
>
> Avoid qualitative assumptions of whether this is a success in
> c++ or not. This is actually a maginal c++ feature that does
> not fit well with the language.
>
> Please discuss this feature vs more powerful and generic
> features like comprehensions.

Discuss the feature/operator in the context of all sequence types
the language and standard library offers. There is no need for D
to end up with more special cases.

(Ease of implementation should not be a distinguishing factor,
that leads to fragmentation in the language design.)

What does this mean? What other sequence types do you expect this to apply to? What special cases are you talking about?