2013/4/9 Timon Gehr <timon.gehr@gmx.ch>

On 04/09/2013 12:13 PM, Artur Skawina wrote:

[snip]

That's not pure by any definition,

I'd counter that it is pure by the D definition.

I completely agree with Timon. It's the definition in D.

The meaning of 'pure' keyword in D *contains* widely used "pure" meaning, rather than differ. The usefulness of the three purity (weak-const-strong) is still there, and the keyword choice for the concept is enough reasonable.

Kenji Hara