On 10/27/20 10:34 PM, Manu wrote:
> I mention that it's a postfix unary operator. I think that implies the
> precedence, no?
> All the postfix operators work from the inside outwards. If there's
> precedence levels in there that I didn't notice, then I can amend to
> make it explicit.
I'd say there's enough subtlety to this to warrant explanation. For
starters, it's not quite an operator because operators yield
expressions, whereas this yields a comma-separated list.
Just to be clear, is there a difference between a comma-separated list and a tuple?
If there is a difference, then `...` results in a tuple, and NOT a comma separated list. The result of `...` is a normal tuple, like any other tuple, and it is subject to D's normal expansion rules. This DIP proposes no effect on existing tuple expansion rules, and plugs into them naturally.