On 10 April 2013 21:36, deadalnix <deadalnix@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 at 17:06:47 UTC, Namespace wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36

I see no point in adding that much complexity for something that can mostly be automated.

Where's the complexity? I find it intuitive and super useful.
I personally see this DIP as just fleshing out the functionality of scope that I imagined/assumed from the moment I learned about the scope keyword. I was actually quite surprised to learn it wasn't already like this :)