On 10 April 2013 22:27, Namespace <rswhite4@googlemail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 at 11:37:43 UTC, Dicebot wrote:

On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 at 11:36:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:

On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 at 17:06:47 UTC, Namespace wrote:

http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36

I see no point in adding that much complexity for something that can mostly be automated.

Can you explain this a bit more extensively, probably with some sort of counter-proposal? I can't see where complexity comes from, this DIP introduces literally zero special cases.

I think he means that the Compiler could/should decide, if something should passed by ref or by value. But I think that would be far more complex than scope ref/in ref.

Right. Yeah, seems more complex for sure. It's also unreliable/unpredictable. Same as with the pure conversation, I really prefer explicit control of things to at least be an option. I really don't want to be guessing about things that I may be depending on.