Again, grammar is irrelevant, since it&#39;s gonna be wrapped anyway.<div>And debuggers are just a matter of time to get right.</div><div>But the redundant vendor-locked obsolete technology is not gonna change.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Paulo Pinto <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:pjmlp@progtools.org" target="_blank">pjmlp@progtools.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 18:24:26 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I think CUDA is a completely pointless waste of time because of OpenCL.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
While I do agree it is better to use standard technologies, the truth is that CUDA wins out against OpenCL in most gamming and HPC scenarios, not to forget how the CUDA debugging tools are miles ahead from OpenCL ones.<br>

<br>
As such, most GPGPU developers don&#39;t care about OpenCL.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Paulo<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Bye,<br>Gor Gyolchanyan.<br>
</div>