On 2 September 2013 06:00, Walter Bright <newshound2@digitalmars.com> wrote:
On 9/1/2013 12:38 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I know you seem to hate automation (because it sometimes fails), but
having each individual person waste hours on initial setup is much
worse than having a script which can potentially fail. At least the
script can be fixed once the bug is reported, and it can be tested.

Back in the bad old Datalight C days, I relied on the Microsoft linker which came on the DOS system disks. Unfortunately, Microsoft constantly changed it, even with the same version of DOS. Worse, numerous other Microsoft products came with yet other versions of LINK.EXE.

All those linkers behaved differently.

It was a frackin' nightmare to support customers with them. I used to have floppy disks packed full of just different versions of LINK.EXE.

This drove me to get our own linker (BLINK.EXE). While it wasn't perfect, either, at least I could actually fix problems with it rather than throwing up my hands in rage being unable to control the situation.

There's no way we can automate VC 2014 so its unpredictable configuration will work. All we can do is react after the fact.

MS always release preview versions to toolchain/workflow vendors though. You just need to register interest to get access afaik.

I don't hate automation. sc.ini works out of the box with the default install of VS 2010.

I don't think my 2010 install is non-standard in any way...

What I need from you guys and your different VS installs is, for each one, a bug report with what is necessary to get it installed. Then we can add it to the modern version of my floppy disk "linker collection".

I posted my sc.ini in a prior post. I'll try and get Simon's from him, since he was on 2012.