On 12 April 2013 23:09, Lars T. Kyllingstad <public@kyllingen.net> wrote:
On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 13:00:36 UTC, Robert wrote:
I would suggest, instead of writing your own std.process, that you
simply provide a pull request to the now to be approved one, this way
you can prove your point that it is easy by already improving a part of
the standard library.

Actually, Manu (or anyone) could do this for *any* part of Phobos.  And considering that std.process is probably the module that would benefit the least from it, maybe he should start somewhere else?  std.string, perhaps, or std.algorithm?

I think I'll have a go at this after dconf. For now, I need to stop distracting myself from my lecture preparation! ;)