On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 06:35, FeepingCreature via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, 25 March 2025 at 04:44:15 UTC, Manu wrote:
> I asked Grok to write me a portable 64x64->128 multiplication
> function in D to get the pattern, and this is what it wrote:
>
> What I loved is that its function returned a pair of ulong's,
> because apparently it made an assumption that we had
> in-language tuples! I wonder where it got that idea?
>
> We should learn from our AI overlords! :P

Note: to get good results from AIs, ask them to write tests as
well, then run the tests and post the answers and ask them to
debug the issue. :) You have to handhold a bit.

I kinda feel like every commenter in this thread rather missed the point ;)

I know how to multiply big numbers; I was just throwing random stuff at it trying to test its limits. The operation is not what I was interested in here; I just liked that it assumed we had tuples! It's right to do so as far as I'm concerned, and it's embarrassing that we don't.