yip, :) can't think of a reason except it was interesting. wish dmd didn't segfault when I used __MODULE__.

on the plus side the requirement for a non basic type is the same requirement that #golang has on its interfaces.

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Dicebot <public@dicebot.lv> wrote:

On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 10:33:26 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:

I have a basic solution but it can't handle basic types LOL! you have to
typedef them so that moduleName!T works.

Of course it can't, built-in types don't have any owning module, those are not symbols. Why would you want to care about basic types anyway?