On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:45 AM tchaloupka via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 09:12:37 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>
> Last time I checked the main reason why vibed was slower has
> been because of HTTP parsing. vibe-core with manual http
> parsing has been the same fast as all other fastest
> alternatives.

I've compared what syscalls various frameworks generates and by
far the most difference makes that in vibe-d response header and
body are written in two separate syscalls (tested on linux with
epoll). That makes a pretty huge difference of about 30% if I
remember correctly. Eventcore itself is not slow and is
comparable with the top ones.

Yes, you are right I have changed that too when I have been trying to make vibed as fast as possible.
 

Tom