On 23 April 2013 21:32, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr@gmx.ch> wrote:
On 04/23/2013 09:07 AM, Namespace wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 03:30:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Previous discussions:

http://forum.dlang.org/thread/4F84D6DD.5090405@digitalmars.com#post-4F84D6DD.5090405:40digitalmars.com


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9238

I still like the Idea of DIP 36 (http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36) with scope
ref / in ref. ...

That's fine. I don't.

Can you suggest a superior/more sensible approach?
I can't see the fault in DIP36's reasoning. It just makes sense. Why is everyone so against it? I'm yet to understand a reason...