DIP1040 suggests to pass the argument implicitly by reference and to not call the destructor...

...S t = s; // calls move constructor (with DIP1040)
    // ...
}
```

```d
void bymove(@move S s){ // ABI...

...you explicitly call `move`.

Of course, with DIP1040, in principle the last use of an...

...The comment is actually inaccurate with DIP1040. With DIP1040, this is a move.


Otherwise, maybe...

I'm starting to seriously question DIP1040's design, if it is even doing what...

...an even better experience in D, but DIP1040 is a good basis. For example, I...

...the record: I am on board with DIP1040, except for the error-prone design of...

...github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1040.md

We're going to get back...

...potentially a performance problem in D without DIP1040.


- volatile:
  Not clear, but I guess `volatile...

What about [Dip 1040](https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/a9c553b0dbab1c2983a801b5e89b51c5c33d5180/DIPs/DIP1040.md)?