July 29 Learn » Re: copy must be const?!? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
...the by-value copy of a parameter? Sorry, but if a type is "logically const... | |||
July 26 Learn » Re: copy must be const?!? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
...creating a mutable copy is not possible). Sorry, but no. It is possible to write... | |||
July 21 Learn » Re: Array concatenation & optimisation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
Sorry, I see what you mean. I've compared the -vasm output (without -O) for... | |||
July 19 Issues » [Issue 7444] Require [] for array copies too | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
...dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7444 Sorry, static array *value* type: string[3][string... | |||
July 15 DIP Ideas » Re: uniform method naming convention for all lib std containers | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
Sorry, that should be O(log n) or better. | |||
July 15 DIP Ideas » Returning variable-sized stack data | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
...int*)mem)[i]);
}
printf("\n");
return 0;
}
```
Sorry if the code is terrible, but hopefully... | |||
July 14 General » Re: DIP 1040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
...across as more official than it is, sorry! See above, it was the consensus that... | |||
July 10 General » Re: Wouldn't this be better with bitfields? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
...maybe mike thought I was being sarcastic, not sure tbh. But I was wrong, sorry. | |||
July 10 General » Re: Wouldn't this be better with bitfields? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
Apparently I'm an idiot who has no idea what he's talking about. Sorry. | |||
July 09 General » Re: Wouldn't this be better with bitfields? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
I'm sorry to say, it does. I've posted in the other thread simple... | |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation