...you use the member-of-operator to define an element you cannot provide a name...

...undefined. I think it's better to define it. That way sum types can be...

...No changes there.

What we want to define is a way to do a kind...

...step at a time.

One way to define a type is as a set of...

...initially parsed then in the specs you define "if the StaticArray sub-type resolves to...

...copies.)

- Do we want some way to define a manual unpacking without `alias this`?

- Do...

...explicitly because you just aren’t allowed to define it is annoying, 100%. Working around that...

...pass -inline to the compiler

Also inlines OK if you define GetFoo outside of Foo

...could try to add something like this before any includes:
```
#define __building_module(name) 0
```

...has_feature(modules) && !__building_module(_Builtin_stddef))
#define _SIZE_T
```

Without more information I can...