May 11, 2012 General » Re: Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
Passing it to templates, where the type has to be inferred to something at a... | |||
May 11, 2012 General » Re: Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
It apparently implicitly converts to any pointer type (but you must cast in order to... | |||
May 11, 2012 General » Re: Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
What were the use-cases for making it a type? Seems odd to declare it... | |||
May 11, 2012 General » Re: Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
It is????? O_________O (welcome to Python, lol...) Ohhmmmmmmmmmmmm interesting, lemme look at that... thanks | |||
May 11, 2012 General » Re: Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
On Fri, 11 May 2012 14:56:45 -0400, Mehrdad <wfunction@hotmail.com> wrote: This... | |||
May 11, 2012 General » Re: Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
...of type typeof(null) to Typedef!(Typedef!(void*,null),Typedef(null)) Which makes sense, except... | |||
May 09, 2012 General » Re: Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
It's nothing more than a general design decision what belongs into druntime and what... | |||
May 09, 2012 General » Re: Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
...of typedef-type with its base-type parameter be rewritten to take a typedef-type... | |||
May 09, 2012 General » Re: Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
In general, we're not sticking anything in druntime unless it needs to be there... | |||
May 09, 2012 General » Re: Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
There is a real trend to purify the language. I also think it's the... | |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation