It's OK. The only reason I was asking is because I may have been...

...kinds of weird errors caused by using typedef instead of D2's alias and trying...

...ve indeed been pretty frustrated at this typedef nonsense (and the like), since it's...

...type. The problem is that the
original typedef did do implicit casting away, and that...

"Native word-sized integer" is such a blurry term, but of course
you
wouldn't...

That doesn't compile on x86_64.

The point of size_t is to be...

That's *such* a lame question...

Even if I _couldn't_ tell you a reason...

Out of curiosity, why would you need to "know" which parameters
are size_t? True...

One solution is to bring back typedef, at least for non-classes and non-interfaces...

well, there's no solution to it of the alias is in use, no matter...