On 30 May 2013 10:41, Russel Winder <russel@winder.org.uk> wrote:
> gdc-4.8 just hit Debian Unstable. Excellent. Well done and thanks to all involved in getting it built and packaged.
>


Thanks - as always there's been a hellalotta bug fixes since pushing. gdc-4.8.1 will be awesome in comparison (being able to pass the D2 testsuite for instance is one major benefit you'll get).

--
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 09:45:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 30 May 2013 10:41, Russel Winder <russel@winder.org.uk> wrote:
>> gdc-4.8 just hit Debian Unstable. Excellent. Well done and thanks to all
>> involved in getting it built and packaged.
>>
>
>
> Thanks - as always there's been a hellalotta bug fixes since pushing.
> gdc-4.8.1 will be awesome in comparison (being able to pass the

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-05/msg00172.html

That means that gdc-4.8.1 will land soon?

On 30 May 2013 12:32, eles <eles@eles.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 09:45:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> On 30 May 2013 10:41, Russel Winder <russel@winder.org.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> gdc-4.8 just hit Debian Unstable. Excellent. Well done and thanks to all involved in getting it built and packaged.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks - as always there's been a hellalotta bug fixes since pushing. gdc-4.8.1 will be awesome in comparison (being able to pass the
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-05/msg00172.html
>
> That means that gdc-4.8.1 will land soon?
>

Yes ... and you'll have to wait another 6 weeks for things to filter down into debian experimental once the package has been rebuilt.


--
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';