Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because

"Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the
templates
implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper)

Has this issue been addressed yet?

Ed Sowell

There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series, but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter


"Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled@home.com> wrote in message news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681@home.com...
> Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because
>
> "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the
> templates
> implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper)
>
> Has this issue been addressed yet?
>
> Ed Sowell
>

Would I be correct in my belief that "template member functions" are part of the "not perfect yet" category?  This is the most precise term I have been able to find for templatized functions as members of a class (which may or may not be a template itself).  'vector' has a constructor that is templatized to take a interator class, as well as several other templatized members.

Just curious, 'coz it's keeping me from testing DMC on my current project.

(And yes, I do understand that templates are amazingly hairy things
and that the developer list for DMC is pretty short...)
Mac

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:59 -0800, "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote:

>There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series, but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter
>
>
>"Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled@home.com> wrote in message news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681@home.com...
>> Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because
>>
>> "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the
>> templates
>> implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper)
>>
>> Has this issue been addressed yet?
>>
>> Ed Sowell
>>
>
>

Yes, you'd be correct! I will get them implemented, though. -Walter

"Mac Reiter" <reiter@nomadics.com> wrote in message news:3c4c6e33.336720909@news.digitalmars.com...
> Would I be correct in my belief that "template member functions" are part of the "not perfect yet" category?  This is the most precise term I have been able to find for templatized functions as members of a class (which may or may not be a template itself).  'vector' has a constructor that is templatized to take a interator class, as well as several other templatized members.
>
> Just curious, 'coz it's keeping me from testing DMC on my current project.
>
> (And yes, I do understand that templates are amazingly hairy things
> and that the developer list for DMC is pretty short...)
> Mac
>
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:59 -0800, "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
> >There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series, but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter
> >
> >
> >"Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled@home.com> wrote in message news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681@home.com...
> >> Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because
> >>
> >> "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the
> >> templates
> >> implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper)
> >>
> >> Has this issue been addressed yet?
> >>
> >> Ed Sowell
> >>
> >
> >
>