Thread overview | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
March 18, 2010 [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
You can download the software as a zip file from: http://download.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip userid: customer passwd: download7 |
March 19, 2010 [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Is that the correct file? It seems to still have the erroneous DLL docs.
On 19 March 2010 03:53, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> You can download the software as a zip file from:
>
>
> http://download.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> userid: customer
> passwd: download7
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
|
March 18, 2010 [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don Clugston | I apparently don't have the right ones, then. Can you send it to me?
Don Clugston wrote:
> Is that the correct file? It seems to still have the erroneous DLL docs.
>
> On 19 March 2010 03:53, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
>> You can download the software as a zip file from:
>>
>>
>> http://download.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>> userid: customer
>> passwd: download7
>>
>>
>>
|
March 18, 2010 [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | I fixed some issues with unittests, and found a bug in the object module (due to unittest failing!). The bug isn't too critical, since nobody is using clear yet, but if you do create a new release (Don seems to have issues with DLL stuff), then it would be good to include it. http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/changeset/270 Note that a unittest still fail on the src/unittest.d file, but I'm not sure that test is valid, it's just over a year old. The offending line is: GC.enable(); Apparently, you can't enable unless it was previously disabled. Is this correct? If that line is commented out, all unittests pass in this latest release + the fixes I checked in. -Steve ----- Original Message ---- > From: Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> > To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com> > Sent: Thu, March 18, 2010 10:53:22 PM > Subject: [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta > > You can download the software as a zip file from: http://download.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip userid: > customer passwd: > download7 _______________________________________________ dmd-beta > mailing list > href="mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com">dmd-beta at puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
March 18, 2010 [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Steve Schveighoffer | Steve Schveighoffer wrote: > I fixed some issues with unittests, and found a bug in the object module (due to unittest failing!). The bug isn't too critical, since nobody is using clear yet, but if you do create a new release (Don seems to have issues with DLL stuff), then it would be good to include it. > > http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/changeset/270 > Since nobody is using clear yet, I'll let that go into the next update, not this one. > Note that a unittest still fail on the src/unittest.d file, but I'm not sure that test is valid, it's just over a year old. The offending line is: > > GC.enable(); > > Apparently, you can't enable unless it was previously disabled. Is this correct? > Yes. > If that line is commented out, all unittests pass in this latest release + the fixes I checked in. > > -Steve > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> >> To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com> >> Sent: Thu, March 18, 2010 10:53:22 PM >> Subject: [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta >> >> You can download the software as a zip file >> from: >> > > > http://download.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip > userid: > >> customer >> > passwd: > >> download7 >> > > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta > >> mailing list >> > > >> href="mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com">dmd-beta at puremagic.com >> > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > dmd-beta at puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta > > > |
March 19, 2010 [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright |
I guess that refers to my (incomplete) update to dll.dd that I've sent you a few days ago. The mydll-example is updated, though.
Walter Bright wrote:
> I apparently don't have the right ones, then. Can you send it to me?
>
> Don Clugston wrote:
>> Is that the correct file? It seems to still have the erroneous DLL docs.
>>
>> On 19 March 2010 03:53, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You can download the software as a zip file from:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://download.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>> userid: customer
>>> passwd: download7
>>>
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
|
March 19, 2010 [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Steve Schveighoffer | On Mar 18, 2010, at 8:56 PM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
> I fixed some issues with unittests, and found a bug in the object module (due to unittest failing!). The bug isn't too critical, since nobody is using clear yet, but if you do create a new release (Don seems to have issues with DLL stuff), then it would be good to include it.
>
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/changeset/270
>
> Note that a unittest still fail on the src/unittest.d file, but I'm not sure that test is valid, it's just over a year old. The offending line is:
>
> GC.enable();
>
> Apparently, you can't enable unless it was previously disabled. Is this correct?
It's a matter of preference, I suppose. I like requiring operations like this to be matched, so it's invalid to call disable() twice and enable() three times. To me, this indicates a logic error in the code.
|
March 20, 2010 [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sean Kelly |
Sean Kelly wrote:
> It's a matter of preference, I suppose. I like requiring operations like this to be matched, so it's invalid to call disable() twice and enable() three times. To me, this indicates a logic error in the code.
>
>
I agree.
|
March 20, 2010 [dmd-beta] Hopefully the last beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sean Kelly | OK, then the unit test is wrong :) -Steve ----- Original Message ---- > From: Sean Kelly <sean at invisibleduck.org> It's a matter of > preference, I suppose. I like requiring operations like this to be matched, so it's invalid to call disable() twice and enable() three times. To me, this indicates a logic error in the code. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing > list > href="mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com">dmd-beta at puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation