This is necessary to fix a memory corruption problem with arrays introduced in 2.042.

http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip

still fails.  It looks like the source is updated, but the libraries are stale.

Also, I can't compile phobos to see if it's just a stale library, something broke with the build process...

-Steve



----- Original Message ----
> From: Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>
> To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
> Sent: Tue, April 6, 2010 8:48:33 PM
> Subject: [dmd-beta] dmd 2.043 beta
> 
> This is necessary to fix a memory corruption problem with arrays introduced in 2.042.

http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta
> mailing list

> href="mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com">dmd-beta at puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
> still fails.  It looks like the source is updated, but the libraries are stale.
> 

I guess this is exactly why I wanted a test case for the test suite!

> Also, I can't compile phobos to see if it's just a stale library, something broke with the build process...
> 

Which system?

> -Steve
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> 
>> From: Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>
>> To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>> Sent: Tue, April 6, 2010 8:48:33 PM
>> Subject: [dmd-beta] dmd 2.043 beta
>>
>> This is necessary to fix a memory corruption problem with arrays introduced in
>> 2.042.
>> 
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta
> 
>> mailing list
>> 
>
> 
>> href="mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com">dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> 
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
>
> 

On Apr 6, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
> I guess this is exactly why I wanted a test case for the test suite!

Is it possible to place new test cases in the public domain and check them in with the source code? I'm pretty sure bugzilla entries can be converted without issue.

Jason House wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>
>> I guess this is exactly why I wanted a test case for the test suite!
>
> Is it possible to place new test cases in the public domain and check them in with the source code? I'm pretty sure bugzilla entries can be converted without issue.
>

It's reasonable to attach them to the bugzilla report.